FullEnrich
B2B waterfall enrichment, 25+ sources
Waterfall enrichment that fires one request across 25+ data providers to lift email and mobile find rates. Strong when you already own a sequencer and the bottleneck is verified contact data.
Outbound and RevOps teams that already run outreach elsewhere and want one credit pool covering 25+ vendors behind a single call.
Contact data only, no motion. No sequences, no LinkedIn steps, no dialer, no warmup, and mobile numbers burn 10 credits each.
Pick it when find rate is the bottleneck and paying per verified contact beats paying per seat. Skip it if you want prospecting and sending in one login.
What it actually does
FullEnrich is a waterfall enrichment engine. You give it a name and company, and it cascades the request across 25+ data providers until something comes back verified: a work email, a personal email, or a mobile number.
Every email has passed triple verification, meaning three independent engines must agree before it reaches you. Catch-all domains, where most tools give up and flag the address as risky, get resolved down to the mailbox. Every mobile number is checked against the carrier network before it lands in your results.
Alongside enrichment there is a people and company search across 800M profiles and 50M companies, plus reverse email lookup. You connect it through an API, an MCP server, or native CRM and no-code connectors. What it does not ship is a sequencer, a dialer, LinkedIn automation, or warmup. It expects you to plug it into something that sends.
The difference in accuracy was pretty striking I went from that ~65% with Apollo/Lusha up to around 90% with FullEnrich. Plus, you only get charged when it actually finds a valid result, so even though it sounds like it'd be pricier, the cost per usable contact ended up being roughly the same. Just way less junk to sift through.
Where it shines
The core win is find rate. Any single vendor misses people; a cascade gives every provider in the chain a shot at each contact before FullEnrich reports a miss, which is how hit rates climb past any one database.
The credit model rewards accuracy. Credits are spent only when a contact is found and verified, so dead-end lookups do not drain the balance. Unlimited users are included, so adding teammates never adds a seat fee, and unused credits roll over: 3 months on monthly billing, 12 on annual.
I recently came across FullEnrich and have only used the free trial so far, but initial results look promising. Before considering it more seriously, I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who has used it longer-term. Specifically, data accuracy, pricing, ease of use, CRM integrations (especially HubSpot)
Where it'll bite you
It is not an outreach platform. No sequences, no sending, no LinkedIn steps, no dialer, no warmup. If your team expected one login for prospecting and engagement, FullEnrich is the wrong shape; you need a sequencer alongside it, and someone has to own the integration.
Mobile phones are the credit sink. A work email costs 1 credit, a personal email 3, and a mobile number 10. On the 1,000-credit Pro plan that is at most 100 mobiles a month, so a phone-heavy motion outgrows the entry tier fast. Phone find rates in EU and APAC also trail US and Canada, so benchmark on your own patch before committing.
And be clear about what you are buying: the underlying data comes from third-party vendors. The value is the cascade, the verification, and the single integration, while the raw sources are ones you could license individually.
combined waterfall got me to around 78% on emails which is way higher than i expected. The FullEnrich portion caught a big chunk that Apollo and Lusha both missed, especially contacts who changed roles in the last months.
What it costs, really
Start with the free trial: 50 credits, no credit card, enough for a small test batch. Pro is $55 per month for 1,000 credits, with Enterprise priced custom.
Credits are all-inclusive of the waterfall: one credit buys the verified work email regardless of how many providers had to be queried. The budgeting exercise that matters is your email-to-mobile ratio. Emails cost 1 to 3 credits and mobiles cost 10, so a list that is mostly emails stretches a plan far further than one where every contact needs a phone number.
A couple of tools get mentioned a lot whenever i ask around (mainly Bettercontact and FullEnrich), but before we switch anything I'd rather hear from people who've used them than trust another round of marketing.
We're an SDR team of 8 on Apollo for outbound, with find rate somewhere in the 50s for a while now and mobile coverage dropping off hard on anything EU-based. Started looking at whether a waterfall enrichment setup would lift those numbers or just add another bill, and from what I've read in this sub FullEnrich, BetterContact, and Prospeo are the ones that come up for the comparison.
Same job, other tools
Also filed under Sales, SDR & outbound:
