---
title: Persana vs Clay
description: "Both blend waterfall enrichment, AI research, and workflow automation on a credit meter. **Persana** is the simpler, cheaper, fully price-published"
canonical: "https://10xgtm.ai/compare/persana-vs-clay"
type: comparison
---

# Persana vs Clay

Both blend waterfall enrichment, AI research, and workflow automation on a credit meter. **Persana** is the simpler, cheaper, fully price-published option, with one enormous footnote: it has announced it is **joining Rox** and the standalone platform is being wound down. **Clay** is the deeper orchestration layer that a RevOps owner designs and maintains, with a bigger ecosystem and no sunset overhang, and a bill that runs on two meters at once.

## The decision

Existing Persana users should plan a deliberate migration and evaluate Rox directly. New buyers deciding between these two: choose Clay when the job is **making GTM data repeatable** across systems and you have someone to own the build; choose the Rox-plus-alternatives path (price Apollo and Clay against it) if you wanted Persana's published prices and a lower technical bar, since signing an annual contract here is a bet on a migration you do not control.

---
Full comparison: https://10xgtm.ai/compare/persana-vs-clay - reviews: https://10xgtm.ai/tool/persana, https://10xgtm.ai/tool/clay